Daily blogging this month made for an excellent excuse to browse the 2009 Webby nominees and winners.
The Webby winner, NASA JPL’s Cassini site, has been redesigned since I last looked at it. It’s visually stunning, smooth and intuitive, with beautiful graphics and clear explanatory information. And, honestly, I don’t know of anyone who doesn’t think that Saturn and its rings are cool.
But, my favorite is another nominee, The Exploratorium’s Evidence: How do we know what we know?. This site completely blew me away with it’s explanatory clarity, its beauty, and its ability to boil the tough topic of how scientific evidence works into a clear set of questions and a process. It’s interactive– it lets participants map how they gather and weigh evidence, and it illustrates a great scientific question, the origin of human beings. It brings the best of the Exploratorium‘s interactive approach to understanding science to the web.
The beauty of science is that evidence isn’t static: scientists are constantly making new discoveries and shifting their notions of what data means based on the greater context of available information. That intellectual give and take is the life-blood and culture of science. How science works, a series of questions illustrates the scientific method in the clearest, most intuitive way that I’ve ever seen.
I often have a conflicted relationship with scientific information on the internet (she says, ironically, as she writes about science on the web). I love that I have access to so much information so easily, and the internet makes my job possible. I’m also frightened by the massive amounts of inaccurate, outdated or even misleading information that I sometimes find on websites and blogs.
However, scientific information presented this well on the internet is a true masterpiece. Congratulations Science Webby nominees and winners!